eintr: Names & Definitions

 
 1.4 Symbol Names and Function Definitions
 =========================================
 
 We can articulate another characteristic of Lisp based on what we have
 discussed so far—an important characteristic: a symbol, like ‘+’, is not
 itself the set of instructions for the computer to carry out.  Instead,
 the symbol is used, perhaps temporarily, as a way of locating the
 definition or set of instructions.  What we see is the name through
 which the instructions can be found.  Names of people work the same way.
 I can be referred to as ‘Bob’; however, I am not the letters ‘B’, ‘o’,
 ‘b’ but am, or was, the consciousness consistently associated with a
 particular life-form.  The name is not me, but it can be used to refer
 to me.
 
    In Lisp, one set of instructions can be attached to several names.
 For example, the computer instructions for adding numbers can be linked
 to the symbol ‘plus’ as well as to the symbol ‘+’ (and are in some
 dialects of Lisp).  Among humans, I can be referred to as ‘Robert’ as
 well as ‘Bob’ and by other words as well.
 
    On the other hand, a symbol can have only one function definition
 attached to it at a time.  Otherwise, the computer would be confused as
 to which definition to use.  If this were the case among people, only
 one person in the world could be named ‘Bob’.  However, the function
 definition to which the name refers can be changed readily.  (See
 Install a Function Definition Install.)
 
    Since Emacs Lisp is large, it is customary to name symbols in a way
 that identifies the part of Emacs to which the function belongs.  Thus,
 all the names for functions that deal with Texinfo start with ‘texinfo-’
 and those for functions that deal with reading mail start with ‘rmail-’.