cl: Efficiency Concerns
Appendix A Efficiency Concerns
******************************
A.1 Macros
==========
Many of the advanced features of this package, such as ‘cl-defun’,
‘cl-loop’, etc., are implemented as Lisp macros. In byte-compiled code,
these complex notations will be expanded into equivalent Lisp code which
is simple and efficient. For example, the form
(cl-incf i n)
is expanded at compile-time to the Lisp form
(setq i (+ i n))
which is the most efficient ways of doing this operation in Lisp. Thus,
there is no performance penalty for using the more readable ‘cl-incf’
form in your compiled code.
_Interpreted_ code, on the other hand, must expand these macros every
time they are executed. For this reason it is strongly recommended that
code making heavy use of macros be compiled. A loop using ‘cl-incf’ a
hundred times will execute considerably faster if compiled, and will
also garbage-collect less because the macro expansion will not have to
be generated, used, and thrown away a hundred times.
You can find out how a macro expands by using the ‘cl-prettyexpand’
function.
-- Function: cl-prettyexpand form &optional full
This function takes a single Lisp form as an argument and inserts a
nicely formatted copy of it in the current buffer (which must be in
Lisp mode so that indentation works properly). It also expands all
Lisp macros that appear in the form. The easiest way to use this
function is to go to the ‘*scratch*’ buffer and type, say,
(cl-prettyexpand '(cl-loop for x below 10 collect x))
and type ‘C-x C-e’ immediately after the closing parenthesis; an
expansion similar to:
(cl-block nil
(let* ((x 0)
(G1004 nil))
(while (< x 10)
(setq G1004 (cons x G1004))
(setq x (+ x 1)))
(nreverse G1004)))
will be inserted into the buffer. (The ‘cl-block’ macro is
expanded differently in the interpreter and compiler, so
‘cl-prettyexpand’ just leaves it alone. The temporary variable
‘G1004’ was created by ‘cl-gensym’.)
If the optional argument FULL is true, then _all_ macros are
expanded, including ‘cl-block’, ‘cl-eval-when’, and compiler
macros. Expansion is done as if FORM were a top-level form in a
file being compiled.
Note that ‘cl-adjoin’, ‘cl-caddr’, and ‘cl-member’ all have
built-in compiler macros to optimize them in common cases.
A.2 Error Checking
==================
Common Lisp compliance has in general not been sacrificed for the sake
of efficiency. A few exceptions have been made for cases where
substantial gains were possible at the expense of marginal
incompatibility.
The Common Lisp standard (as embodied in Steele’s book) uses the
phrase “it is an error if” to indicate a situation that is not supposed
to arise in complying programs; implementations are strongly encouraged
but not required to signal an error in these situations. This package
sometimes omits such error checking in the interest of compactness and
efficiency. For example, ‘cl-do’ variable specifiers are supposed to be
lists of one, two, or three forms; extra forms are ignored by this
package rather than signaling a syntax error. Functions taking keyword
arguments will accept an odd number of arguments, treating the trailing
keyword as if it were followed by the value ‘nil’.
Argument lists (as processed by ‘cl-defun’ and friends) _are_ checked
rigorously except for the minor point just mentioned; in particular,
keyword arguments are checked for validity, and ‘&allow-other-keys’ and
‘:allow-other-keys’ are fully implemented. Keyword validity checking is
slightly time consuming (though not too bad in byte-compiled code); you
can use ‘&allow-other-keys’ to omit this check. Functions defined in
this package such as ‘cl-find’ and ‘cl-member’ do check their keyword
arguments for validity.
A.3 Compiler Optimizations
==========================
Changing the value of ‘byte-optimize’ from the default ‘t’ is highly
discouraged; many of the Common Lisp macros emit code that can be
improved by optimization. In particular, ‘cl-block’s (whether explicit
or implicit in constructs like ‘cl-defun’ and ‘cl-loop’) carry a fair
run-time penalty; the byte-compiler removes ‘cl-block’s that are not
actually referenced by ‘cl-return’ or ‘cl-return-from’ inside the block.